The PMI-ACP® exam costs $435 for PMI members — seven domains, 120 questions. ACP Dojo runs the full qualification round before any of that is on the table.
Most ACP candidates have read about Agile. I've run it.
Takt time. Pull planning. Adaptive control. Flow. On an active nine-story job site.
The exam finally has a name for it. I built the engine to verify you know it too.
The PMI-ACP® tests seven domains independently. A strong score in one does not compensate for a gap in another. The engine evaluates all seven — no averaging, no hiding.
The philosophical foundation. Agile Manifesto. Twelve principles. The why before the how. The domain that separates practitioners from people who memorized frameworks.
FoundationPrioritizing and delivering value continuously. MVP. MMP. Release strategies. The discipline of deciding what ships first — and why.
Must PassCollaboration, communication, and facilitation techniques. The People domain. Active listening, conflict resolution, servant leadership.
Building, growing, and protecting high-performance Agile teams. The domain a superintendent lives in every day. Takt zones are teams. Trade sequencing is team performance.
Must PassPlanning in iterations. Rolling wave. Release planning. Exactly what Takt Planning is — a rhythm-based adaptive plan that responds to what the work reveals. Not a fixed CPM schedule. A living system.
Must PassIdentifying and removing impediments. Blockers, bottlenecks, risk. The Law of Bottlenecks. In Takt, throughput is controlled by the slowest trade. In Agile, velocity is controlled by the biggest blocker. Same principle.
Retrospectives. Kaizen. Process improvement cycles. The Culture of Kaizen. The same PDCA cycle that drives Lean Construction drives Agile iterations. The founder holds certifications in both — because they are the same discipline in different languages.
FoundationTakt Planning and Integrated Control is Agile applied to construction. Not metaphorically. Structurally. The same principles — in a different language — executed on a live job site with 200 trade workers and real consequences.
When the PMI codified the Agile Certified Practitioner credential, they gave names to methods that construction superintendents had been running for years. Pull planning is Kanban. Takt time is sprint cadence. Zone-by-zone iterative delivery is incremental release. Last Planner System is retrospective and commitment tracking.
I implemented all of it on the Marriott hotel projects — TETRA and AC Hotel — before I knew the PMI had an exam for it. I didn't read about adaptive planning. I ran it on a nine-story structure while managing concrete pours, steel erection, MEP coordination, and 17 active trade crews simultaneously.
The PMI-ACP® tests whether you understand these principles. I built the engine to verify you know them as well as someone who has lived them.
Any practice tool gives you a score across seven domains and tells you to study more. ACP Dojo reads the pattern beneath your answers and tells you something no practice test ever could: not what you got wrong, but why your mind got it wrong. A full qualification round — domain by domain.
Every PMI-ACP® domain cleared. Every threshold held. The MRI™ scanned all five mastery signatures — every one confirmed. The qualification round is complete.
Qualified. Book the seat.
In Agile, returning to the sprint is not failure. It is the system working. The engine has identified exactly which failure signature is blocking your qualification. Address it. Return. The threshold does not move.
Returning to the sprint is the Agile way. The engine tells you exactly which story card to work on next.
A sprint retrospective doesn't just measure velocity — it reads the pattern of what was committed and what was delivered, and asks why the gap exists. The UTOS MRI™ does the same for your knowledge: it reads the invisible pattern in your answers — the sequence, the clustering, the confidence — to reveal not what you got wrong, but why your mind got it wrong.
Every other tool gives you practice questions. UTOS gives you a verdict. Built by a Lean Certified Practitioner who implemented Takt Planning on live hotel projects — and knows exactly what the PMI-ACP® is actually testing.
Conceptual Inversion. Application Blindness. Threshold Blindness. Domain Masking. Confidence-Accuracy Divergence. Not weaknesses — diagnoses. The PMI-ACP® is 80% situational questions. Application Blindness is the most common killer.
Every study action is keyed to the specific failure signature causing it. Not "study stakeholder engagement more." Exactly what is structurally wrong with how you understand it right now — and exactly what to do next sprint.
This is not a list of what you missed. It is a precise diagnosis of how your mind is currently failing the PMI-ACP® standard — specifically in the Stakeholder Engagement domain.
Not what you missed — what your mind is doing wrong with stakeholder facilitation and conflict resolution scenarios.
You can define every stakeholder facilitation technique in the PMBOK. You cannot apply the right one to a real scenario under exam conditions. The engine identified consistent failure on situational stakeholder questions while definitional questions in the same domain passed with high scores.
Stakeholder situational questions: 7 of 12 missed. Stakeholder definition questions: 5 of 6 correct. You know the tools. You cannot select the right tool for the situation. That is the signature — and it is the most common failure mode on the PMI-ACP®.
In conflict resolution scenarios, the engine detected a structural inversion. You are defaulting to directive resolution when the Agile standard requires facilitated resolution. You believe the leader's role in conflict is to decide. The PMI-ACP® answer is always to facilitate — not decide.
Conflict resolution questions: 4 of 5 missed — all in the same direction. Not random errors. A consistent inversion of the servant leadership principle in conflict scenarios.
Keyed to the failure signatures identified. Address in order. Return when the sprint is complete.
ACP Dojo was not built by a trainer who studied Agile. It was built by a Senior Superintendent who implemented Takt Planning and Integrated Control — the Lean Construction production system that IS Agile — on a nine-story Marriott hotel project in the Bay Area.
Takt time is sprint cadence. Pull planning is Kanban. Zone-by-zone iterative delivery is incremental release. Last Planner System is the retrospective. The Law of Bottlenecks is the WIP limit. I ran all of it — before the PMI had an exam for it.
I also hold certifications in Lean Expert, Lean Specialist, Lean A3 Process Management, Just-In-Time, Value Stream Mapping, Culture of Kaizen, and Construction Management Introduction to Lean Construction. The Lean body of knowledge and the Agile body of knowledge are the same river flowing in the same direction. I have been in that river for ten years.
I built this engine for the candidate who is serious. The one who wants a verdict — not a percentage. The one who wants to know they are qualified before they book the seat.
READINESS VERIFIED
This verifies that
Carlos Ochoa
has met the readiness standard for the
PMI-ACP® Agile Certified Practitioner Examination
STANDARDS MET
Verified March 23, 2026
Prometheous Lee
PROMETHEOUS LEE · FOUNDER & CHIEF ARCHITECT
ACP DOJO
This document reflects performance on N1XTC’s internal readiness assessment and does not guarantee passage of any examination administered by the FCC or ARRL.
When you earn Readiness Verified, your certificate is available immediately — your name, the date the standard was met, the certification level it covers. Download as PDF.
Readiness Verified is a standard, not a score. The certificate records that a defined PMI® standard was applied, evaluated, and met — on a specific date, for a specific certification level.
Heavy linen paper. Gold foil embossed seal. Engraved border. Mailed flat, sized to fit a standard diploma frame.
The PMI-ACP® costs $495 — 120 situational questions across seven domains. No other tool tells you not just what you got wrong, but why your mind got it wrong. The MRI™ sees the pattern beneath your answers. The sprint backlog tells you exactly what to work on next. Return when complete. Qualified will be waiting.
Know When You're ReadyACP Dojo runs on UTOS — the Universal Testing Operating System. A subject-agnostic readiness engine that verifies candidates are genuinely qualified before they sit for a certification exam. Not a question bank. Not a practice score. A verdict — with a sprint backlog for what comes next.
The PMI-ACP® is 80% situational questions. ACP Dojo is built specifically to diagnose why a candidate fails situational questions — not just which ones they miss. That is what the engine was built to do.
An ALVERITAS product →A verdict. Not a score. The engine runs the PMI-ACP® standard across all seven domains and returns a binary answer with a specific reason. Either every threshold is met or it is not.
A dated, verifiable ALVERITAS credential number. Walk into the Scrum Master interview, the Agile Coach conversation, the promotion review. Tell them to look it up at alveritas.com/verify. Ten seconds. No login.
A certification is a historical record. The ALVERITAS Credentialing Registry is a live institutional lookup. Hiring managers and program directors can verify current Agile readiness in ten seconds — not just prior passage.
Organizations running Agile transformations can verify that their certified practitioners meet the readiness standard today — not just that they attended training. A rate. A record. Evidence the investment produced results.